“从人类历史上来看,所有人围坐在一张圆桌边上,彼此交换看法,相互辩论,碰撞思想,但是最终还是和和气气结束的时代算是个意外。大多数时候不是这样的,大多数时候人们是坐在一张长桌的两头,疯狂往对面投掷酒杯和碗碟,真心实意地希望能把对面某个人砸得头破血流。前者叫批评,后者叫械斗。”
摘抄自: 如何理解网络批评
July 29, 2022 at 04:02PM
——————
“要谨慎地选择那些尚可交流,愿意遵循批评原则的人。其实也没有多复杂,就是能做到讨论归讨论,交往归交往的人。虽然很简单,但是能做到的人却越来越少。”
摘抄自: 如何理解网络批评
July 29, 2022 at 04:02PM
——————
“无论持有何种观点,也无论反对何种观点,最终人都需要回到生活中来,在生活中实践和检验观点—只是说现在人们在网络世界里花费的时间已经超过现实生活,所以不清楚所谓生活具体指的是哪一个;”
摘抄自: 如何理解网络批评
July 29, 2022 at 04:03PM
——————
“小心地选择可以展开网络批评的人,和批评的议题。大多数人容易感觉到冒犯,他们不是合适的对话对象;”
摘抄自: 如何理解网络批评
July 29, 2022 at 04:03PM
——————
“思考是你的事,这意味着有多少人赞同你,又或者是反对你,根本不重要。因为你的鞋穿在你的脚上,你的路也只能你自己走,他人无法为你背负任何东西;”
摘抄自: 如何理解网络批评
July 29, 2022 at 04:03PM
——————
“The multiday protest in the square had ended peacefully. But outside of the square bloody riots took place over several days and nights during which hundreds of soldiers and rioters got killed. The protest and riots had been a U.S. instigated color revolution attempt with the father of the color revolution concept, Gene Sharp, being personally in the Beijing and consulting the protest leaders. After the attempt had failed the CIA organized the exit of hundreds of protest leaders and agents to Hong Kong where they formed the base for the 2020 color revolution attempt there. Lots of those ‘activists’ have now moved to Taiwan.”
摘抄自: Provoking Beijing
July 29, 2022 at 04:17PM
——————
“In the 1950s and 60s the U.S. financed terrorism in Tibet. In 1989 it coached and financed a bloody color revolution attempt in Beijing. In the 1990s it brought Islamist terrorism to Xinjiang. In this century the U.S. instigated several periods of riots in Hong Kong.”
摘抄自: Provoking Beijing
July 29, 2022 at 04:31PM
——————

Zeta Ophiuchi: A Star With a Complicated Past Zeta Ophiuchi is a star with a complicated past, having likely been ejected from its birthplace by a powerful stellar explosion. A new look by NASA’s Chandra X-ray Observatory helps tell more of the story of this runaway star.
——————

– – – – –
晚安哦

发表回复

您的电子邮箱地址不会被公开。

此站点使用Akismet来减少垃圾评论。了解我们如何处理您的评论数据